Feeds:
Posts
Comments

I also post regular and timely legal updates on my Facebook page.  Come on by, visit for awhile and “like” my page.

255 N. Wilson Street, Suite B
P.O. Box 180
Nipomo, CA 93444
(805) 929-7150
(805) 929-7151 Fax
(805) 431-2812 Cell
guy@guymurraylaw.net

GM Lawrys

 

This story is indeed tragic; however, it was completely avoidable, and emphasizes with a harsh reality the absolute need to create and have in place a valid, functioning estate plan, including a trust, will, power of attorney, and health care directive. The link to the entire story in the Boston Globe is below. I encourage you to read the entire story. Here are a copy of money quotes:

“Noel Aimes, who never learned to read and write, wanted the house to stay in the family, and in the 1990s proudly built additions to accommodate its growing numbers, Harrison said. But because he died two years after his wife and didn’t name a beneficiary, state law allows his blood relatives — specifically his nieces and nephews in Barbados — to claim the house over a stepchild.

Since you were not an heir-at-law, your appointment is in jeopardy of being set aside,” wrote Gayle Stone-Turesky, a Boston lawyer who was appointed by the state as a public administrator, who is brought in to handle estates where there is no will and no blood heir living in the state.”

If you don’t have an estate plan in place, or if you have one that needs updating, feel free to email me at anytime for a no cost, no obligation, in person consultation. You can reach me at guy@guymurraylaw.net. Tomorrow is promised to no one . . .

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2019/02/06/patriarch-leaves-will-and-home-meant-for-his-cambridge-family-may-lost/JJ0HULAFuoY38eQUt6JBiJ/story.html?fbclid=IwAR3HnOqU_cmK2dtG6ismgqCw7Dt5rI09E0VWwKM6aQblATeAd2uiA-jwlU0

#jointtenancy #jointtenants #nipomo #nipomolaw#nipomolawyer #probate #nipomoprobate#nipomotrusts #nipomowills #trustsandestates#trustlawyer #probatelawyer #personalinjury#triallawyer #trusts #wills #estateplan#powerofattorney #healthcaredirective#estateplanning #digitalassets #advancedirective#revocabletrust

Steps in Estate Planning

Good recap in a recent Motley Fool Article on the steps of estate planning:

“What are the steps of estate planning?

The steps involved in making an estate plan include the following:

Identify your goals for creating an estate plan: Do you want to provide for your family, protect assets, prepare for incapacity, take control of your legacy, or do all of the above?

List the asset you want to include in your plan: When making a plan, you need to consider all of the money and property you own either independently or jointly.

Identify the risks to your assets and make plans to protect them: If you lose your wealth because of high nursing-home costs, because of creditor claims, or because you don’t make a business succession plan, then you’ll undermine your efforts to leave a legacy. You need to know what risks you face and mitigate them.

Identify the loved ones you want to provide for and protect: There may be many people in your life whom you need to consider in your plan, including not a spouse, children, friends, and even pets. And your loved ones may all have different needs. For example, your minor children will need a guardian if you can’t raise them to adulthood.

Decide whether you want to make charitable contributions: You may want to make bequests in your will to a charity, or take other steps to give such as creating a foundation or a charitable remainder trust.

Determine whether your potential heirs or beneficiaries have any special needs: In some cases, you’ll need to take extra steps to ensure that an inheritance is transferred appropriately and used wisely.

Determine whether you’ll owe estate tax: The federal government and some states charge taxes on larger estates.

Decide whether avoiding probate is one of your goals: In most cases, assets transfer through the probate process, which can be complicated and expensive. You may want to avoid this, and that will require different estate planning techniques.

Think about what will happen if you become incapacitated: If an illness or injury leaves you temporarily or permanently incapacitated, you’ll need to consider questions such as who will make decisions for you and what kinds of care you’ll receive or reject. You’ll also need to think about who will provide you with care and how you’ll pay for it.

Make sure you have the right insurance policies: If you don’t have enough money to provide for dependent loved ones, you may need to obtain additional coverage, such as life insurance.
Determine what legal tools you’ll need to use: You may need to use tools such as trusts, a power of attorney, advance directives, and a last will and testament to accomplish your goals, provide for loved ones, and prepare for incapacity.

Implement your plan: This could involve taking steps such as changing how property is owned, creating legal documents, or transferring assets into a trust. You should likely have a lawyer help with this step.”

Here’s the link to the entire article. If you would like to update or begin an estate plan, or just discuss estate planning in general, feel free to email me for an in person, no obligation, no cost one on one meeting: guy@guymurraylaw.net

#jointtenancy #jointtenants #nipomo #nipomolaw #nipomolawyer #probate#nipomoprobate #nipomotrusts #nipomowills #trustsandestates #trustlawyer#probatelawyer #personalinjury #triallawyer #trusts #wills #estateplan#powerofattorney #healthcaredirective #estateplanning #digitalassets

A recent study in the Insurance Journal reflects that there is not really a correlation between Tort Reform–so called–and the way doctors actually practice medicine:

Physicians’ fears of being sued for malpractice are out of proportion to their actual risk of being sued, according to a recent study.

The study by a University of Iowa researcher and colleagues also suggests that tort reform legislation aimed at controlling malpractice costs has not lessened physician concerns about malpractice lawsuits, and may not be effective in altering defensive medicine practices — like ordering unnecessary lab tests — that can drive up the cost of health care.

“We found that both generalist and specialist physicians fear being sued for malpractice even in states where their risk of being sued is relatively low,” said senior study author David Katz, M.D., associate professor of medicine with University of Iowa Health Care. “One likely explanation is that physicians’ concerns about malpractice are driven more by their perception that the malpractice tort process is unfair and arbitrary and less by their actual risk of getting sued.”

One of the biggest reasons given by the insurance industry and the medical community for tort reform is that such reform would allow doctors to practice without the need for additional but needless tests.  Doesn’t look like a very good reason after all.

 

 

If American’s can believe anything anymore about Congress and the Estate Tax it is that they proven incapable of the most simple acts of governance.  For nine years everyone knew the tax would expire in 2010 yet despite that knowledge Congress was unable to agree on a compromise so it expired.  Now with just a few weeks left in 2010 we are no further ahead than where we were last year at this time.  The Wall Street Journal notes that the tax is about to return with a vengeance:

Overlooked in the brawl over expiring Bush-era tax rates is what will happen to the death tax. Without action in the lame duck Congress, the estate tax will rise from the dead on January 1 with a vengeance, the rate climbing back to 55% from zero this year. The exemption amount will revert to a miserly $1 million, unindexed for inflation, so more middle class taxpayers will get hit year after year.

Of course there are compromises that are possible, but given recent Congressional inaction, on the same subject one cannot assume one will actually pass:

Liberals are content to let the rate revert to 55%, with some moderate Democrats arguing for a 45% rate. Republican Jon Kyl of Arizona and Democrat Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas are pushing a compromise that would lower the top rate to 35% with a $5 million deduction. That rate is still 35 percentage points too high for our liking, but we’ll take it as an alternative to the greedy political confiscation of more than half of the wealth built by someone who has saved over a lifetime. An estate of $5 million isn’t all that much for a successful and thrifty business person with some real estate to accumulate over 50 or 60 years.

Most Americans appear to favor some compromise–unfortunately most Americans are not serving in Congress:

President Obama and Congressional Democrats don’t think this is a high priority, but voters do. A November Gallup Poll found that Americans think that keeping the estate tax “from increasingly significantly” is “very important” by 56% to 17% “not too important.” That’s more than think it is a priority to extend current tax rates (50%), extend jobless benefits (48%), ratify the Start treaty (40%) or let openly gay men and women serve in the military (32%).

Congress really only has until about mid month when it adjourns for its current session, and the remainder of the year.  Further inaction will only hurt middle class families more, particularly since they are the least able to cope with the new estate tax rates than are the heirs of the very wealthy.  Stay tuned . . .

An interesting special report from the Tax Foundation entitled:  The Federal Estate Tax: Will it Rise From the Grave un 2011 or Sooner?  You can read the entire report here:  The Federal Estate Tax.  See also here.

Effective 01/01/09, Assembly Bill  AB 3000, passed by the California Legislature, amended Probate Code sections 4780, 4782, 4783, 4784, and 4785 relating to health care decisions and life sustaining treatment. Nationwide, similar legislation is known as Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST), in states that have adopted similar measures. Continue Reading »

%d bloggers like this: